![]() |
| PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING: Beyond Equipment Terry Petro December 2001
Software speeds and simplifies time-consuming, essential tasks.
Three-quarters
of the customers purchasing one manufacturer’s
pharmaceuticalpackaging equipment now also purchase optional
software that provides
documentation for qualification and validation. These packages offer
increasing
levels of documentation and service on equipment specifications and
performance to those specifications, up to and including running the
qualification testing at the user’s site. At all levels, process documentation helps ease the strain of preparing the support materials for a company’s filing for FDAapproval of a new pharmaceutical products. A subset of filing is documenting that the processing equipment has been tested to assure it is performing reliably according to its specifications. Ultimately the pharmaceutical manufacturer is responsible for supplying the data to support that validation, but documentation generated by the equipment manufacturer can play a valuable part in the process. Pharmaceutical companies choose the software approach for varied reasons: whether small or large, they often cannot spare the experienced staff members capable of doing the work for the length of time such procedures require. Writing the test protocols, then performing the tests, may imply a lack of objectivity that requires time and effort to overcome—time and effort that may delay the launch of a critical new product. Like hiring a third-party evaluator, having the equipment’s performance verified by the equipment's manufacturer may imply greater credibility. Not every
call for documentation involves FDA approval. Customers purchasing
cartoners or other secondary equipment also purchase documentation
software to ensure that the equipment is running to cGMP standards and
to set a baseline for performance measurement. As documentation
capabilities have evolved over the past ten years, software services
have been divided into packages so that users can select the level of
assistance they need.
Standard documentation packages should include the following:
And may include... Additional services offered by equipment manufacturers may include writing the IQ/OQ/PQ protocols for equipment qualification testing. Such a service can save the end user or its third-party testing firm the costly time and effort required for writing test protocols for equipment. The test results are also more complete and tend to produce more accurate documentation when the protocol is written by the machine manufacturer familiar with the equipment. The manufacturer may also be able to supply operating personnel to run the equipment during testing and/or providing supervision of staff or third party firm personnel to ensure thoroughness. In some cases, manufacturer can even perform the protocol testing for the user.
Clearly, the
main benefit of having a manufacturer involved in providing
documentation, writing protocols, and assisting in the testing process
is saved time and reduced cost of qualifying equipment. But a high
level of accurate detail in equipment and test documentation is also a
valuable investment that may be useful during FDA inspections.
Documentation
services have evolved into an integral part of customer service in the
pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. It is expected that the
value will continue to grow as equipment increased in complexity as
electronic sensors, alarms, and controls enter the marketplace.
|